A Safe Classroom Is Not Enough
Can we really say a child has access to education if getting to school exposes them to violence, exploitation, or other forms of harm? INEE argues that Education in Emergencies and Child Protection should not operate as separate humanitarian systems. Their 2025 consultation gathered responses from 362 education and child-protection practitioners, with 64% working in crisis contexts.
The reasoning is straightforward but important. Integrated programs can reduce protection risks, improve well-being and educational outcomes, increase enrollment and retention, and prevent vulnerable children from disappearing between disconnected services. They can also reduce duplicated work at a time when humanitarian funding and capacity are increasingly constrained.
This reveals a weakness in how we sometimes measure educational access. Counting classrooms, textbooks, or enrollment tells us whether education exists, but not necessarily whether children are safe enough to benefit from it.
Humanitarian education should therefore begin with the child rather than the institution. A successful program is not simply one that puts students back into classrooms—it is one that asks what risks surround those students and builds education around their safety, dignity, and well-being.
댓글